For research and education only · Not reviewed by a medical professional · Disclaimer · Contains affiliate links

Peptide encyclopedia/ LL-37
Illustration for LL-37

THE PEPSRADAR ENCYCLOPEDIA

LL-37

Host-defense peptide and wound research

Research topics · Sources checked 2026-10-04

Read the studies ↓Explore the molecule ↗

LL-37 AT A GLANCE

The question behind the molecule.

Read findings and limitations ↓
2 selected publicationsContext mattersA topical wound trial cannot establish the safety or effect of a systemic research product.

What is LL-37?

LL-37 is a human host-defense peptide investigated in wound biology. The selected clinical study tested topical treatment in a defined ulcer population.

Biological role or research focus

Host-defense peptide and wound research.

A topical wound trial cannot establish the safety or effect of a systemic research product.

Role reference: Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. ↗

Names you may encounter

LL37 · LL 37 · cathelicidin

Search terms can include brands, combinations, or historical names. They are not automatic product equivalents.

Class / identity
Host-defense peptide
Main research area
Wound-healing research
Evidence featured
Human phase 2b trial
Source check
October 4, 2026

Source: Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. ↗

Molecular structure

LL-37: 2d molecular structure. The cited molecular record is shown. Salts, protonation, and formulation ingredients may differ from a specific product.⤢ Enlarge 2D
2D molecular structureThe cited molecular record is shown. Salts, protonation, and formulation ingredients may differ from a specific product.PubChem · CID 16198951 ↗

Mechanism & research rationale

Its biological context includes innate defense and tissue responses. Whether those properties improve healing must be tested against standard care in the relevant type of wound.

Source: Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. ↗

Research context & status

HEAL LL-37 evaluated topical treatment plus compression for venous ulcers. It did not establish systemic infection treatment or a general immune-enhancement use.

Source: Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. ↗

What does the evidence show?

Selected published evidence, with the population, findings, and limits kept together. These original summaries draw on publication abstracts; they are not a systematic review.

Human phase 2b trial · 2021

HEAL LL-37

Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Population / model
148 people with hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers.
Study design
Topical LL-37 versus placebo, alongside compression therapy.
Main finding
The full study population showed no significant healing improvement. A post hoc subgroup with larger ulcers showed signals of benefit.
Limits & context
A subgroup found after the main analysis is hypothesis-generating. Topical tolerability cannot establish the safety of systemic injection or prove antimicrobial benefit for unrelated infections.

Source: Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. ↗

Human randomized trial · 2014

LL-37 · first topical ulcer trial

Did the early wound-healing signal persist in larger research?

Population / model
34 people with hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers.
Study design
Placebo run-in, four-week double-blind treatment with three topical concentrations or placebo, and four-week follow-up.
Main finding
The lowest concentration had a significantly higher healing-rate constant than placebo (P=0.003); the middle comparison did not reach significance (P=0.088). The highest concentration showed no healing difference.
How to read it
Within-group wound reduction and a treatment-versus-placebo comparison answer different questions.
Limits & context
Small sample and short follow-up limit confidence. The later 148-person trial did not improve healing overall. These topical findings do not establish systemic antimicrobial efficacy or safe injectable use.

Source: LL-37 · first topical ulcer trial · 2014 ↗

Read the original paper for methods, adverse events, funding, and conflicts of interest. Publisher access may require a subscription.

Related records in our PubMed snapshot

Combinatorial therapy of LL-37 and ADSCs accelerates diabetic wound repair by orchestrating NRROS-mediated crosstalk between TGF-β/SMAD and hippo/TEAD1 axes. ↗
Cytokine · Issue date 2026 Nov · Not appraised

WITHDRAWN: Corrigendum to "Oroxylin A suppress LL-37 generated rosacea-like skin inflammation through the modulation of SIRT3-SOD2-NF-κB signaling pathway" [Int. Immunopharmacol. 129 (2024) 111636]. ↗
International immunopharmacology · Issue date 2026 Oct 15 · Not appraised

Corrigendum to "Oroxylin A suppress LL-37 generated rosacea-like skin inflammation through the modulation of SIRT3-SOD2-NF-κB signaling pathway" [Int. Immunopharmacol. 129 (2024) 111636]. ↗
International immunopharmacology · Issue date 2026 Oct 1 · Not appraised

Exposure to the antimicrobial peptides LL-37 and ATRA-1 induces a lipidome response in Staphylococcus aureus that alters membrane biophysical properties. ↗
Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · Issue date 2026 Oct · Not appraised

Coordination chemistry and antimicrobial activity of LL-37, its C-terminal fragment, and a peptidomimetic analogue. ↗
Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) · Issue date 2026 Sep 29 · Not appraised

Search additional PubMed records ↗

New editorial updates

Loading approved updates…

New source discoveries

Links appear automatically. Unreviewed discoveries are not verified medical findings.

Loading recent discoveries…

Explore the latest source feed →

Safety & precautions

Safety evidence & remaining uncertainty

FDA highlights limited safety data and nonclinical concerns. A tolerable topical trial cannot answer the risks of systemic exposure.

Source: FDA · Peptide compounding safety concerns ↗

This is not a complete list of contraindications, interactions, or adverse effects. Medicine labels apply to specific products and indications; research-use listings are not interchangeable with approved medicines.

What are people discussing?

No editorial transcript note has been reviewed for this profile yet. Below are the matching video records available for exploration; title and caption matches are not verified claims.

Watch the source discussions

5 matching video records · 1 with captions indexed.

Across the full library, 30 caption files are indexed from 20,199 inventoried videos. Most transcripts remain unreviewed. Select a thumbnail or timestamp to watch inside PepsRadar. Thumbnail images load from YouTube.

Sources & supplier listings

Listings are grouped by the vendor’s stated identity. Blends and modified derivatives are labeled separately. Inclusion is not a quality assessment or an endorsement.

Named compound

LL-37 (5mg)

BioLongevity Labs · Vendor-labeled research use only

$94.97

Listed in stock · Snapshot 2026-10-04
Options may vary. Shipping and tax excluded.

View seller listing ↗

Affiliate link · PepsRadar may earn a commission from purchases through this link. Affiliate disclosure.

Named compound

LL-37 (5 mg)

PSPeptides · Vendor-labeled research use only

$79.99

Listed in stock · Snapshot 2026-10-05
Options may vary. Shipping and tax excluded.

View seller listing ↗

Affiliate link · PepsRadar may earn a commission from purchases through this link. Affiliate disclosure.

Catalog checked 2026-10-04. Seller listings retain their stated intended use. Shops covered: BioLongevity Labs, BioLongevity Supplements, American Peptides, PSPeptides. This is not a market-wide comparison. Affiliate participation does not determine evidence or editorial coverage.

Questions worth asking

  • What specific product, route, and research population does the claim refer to?
  • Does the source measure an outcome in people, or only a laboratory marker?
  • A topical wound trial cannot establish the safety or effect of a systemic research product.
  • What adverse effects, uncertainty, and conflicts of interest does the original source report?

Frequently asked questions

Did the full wound trial show a benefit?

No significant overall healing benefit was found.

Source: Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. ↗

Why is the large-ulcer subgroup not conclusive?

It was a post hoc analysis. Such a finding should guide a new properly designed study rather than replace the main result.

Source: Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. ↗

References & editorial record

Source notes checked 2026-10-04. Original PepsRadar summaries. Not reviewed by a medical professional. Topic grouping is editorial navigation, not a treatment recommendation. Video notes specify which excerpts were reviewed; no full transcripts are published.

For research and education only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Research-only listings are not instructions for human use.

WATCH ON PEPSRADAR

Watch video

MOLECULAR ATLAS

LL-37

Download illustration ↓Source record ↗
LL-37 2d molecular structure

The cited molecular record is shown. Salts, protonation, and formulation ingredients may differ from a specific product.